CMS Virtual Direct Supervision 2025: Key Questions for Radiology Practices

CMS Virtual Direct Supervision 2025: Key Questions for Radiology Practices

CMS Virtual Direct Supervision 2025: Key Questions for Radiology Practices

This article addresses pivotal questions surrounding the CMS policy allowing virtual direct supervision of diagnostic tests via real-time audio and visual telecommunications technology. With insights drawn from regulatory updates, advocacy efforts, and industry commentary, the article provides radiology professionals with clarity and reassurance as they navigate this evolving landscape, emphasizing compliance with CMS, state, and accreditation standards. Learn about two-way audio-visual interactive platforms, active monitoring details, IDTFs, included Level 2 services and more.

Tether Supervision

Feb 28, 2025

Legal & Regulatory

Legal & Regulatory

Legal & Regulatory

An article discussing CMS virtual direct supervision policy, its extension through 2025, requirements for real-time audio/visual technology, and advocacy for permanent remote supervision in radiology.
An article discussing CMS virtual direct supervision policy, its extension through 2025, requirements for real-time audio/visual technology, and advocacy for permanent remote supervision in radiology.
An article discussing CMS virtual direct supervision policy, its extension through 2025, requirements for real-time audio/visual technology, and advocacy for permanent remote supervision in radiology.

Will CMS’s Authority for Virtual Direct Supervision Extend Beyond 2025?

The CMS policy allowing virtual direct supervision of certain diagnostic tests via real-time audio and visual interactive telecommunications technology is currently set to expire on December 31, 2025, per the 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) Final Rule. While this deadline may raise concerns, there is reason for optimism. The policy has been extended annually since its introduction in 2020, and strong advocacy from organizations like the the American College of Radiology (ACR) and Radiology Business Management Association (RBMA) support making it permanent, particularly for lower-risk services, due to its proven benefits in enhancing access without compromising safety.

What Does "Real-Time Audio and Visual Interactive Telecommunications Technology" Mean? What tools does that include?

This term refers to a setup where the supervising physician or practitioner can monitor and interact with the diagnostic procedure as it happens, using technology that provides both live video and live audio. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Real-Time: The supervision occurs simultaneously with the test—no delays or recordings. The physician must be available to intervene immediately if needed.

  • Audio and Visual: The technology must include both a live video feed (to see the patient, staff, or equipment) and two-way audio (to communicate instructions or address issues). CMS explicitly excludes audio-only methods (e.g., phone calls) for this purpose.

  • Interactive: The system allows the supervisor to actively engage—asking questions, giving directions, or responding to the on-site staff (e.g., technologists) in real time.

  • Examples: Think of platforms like Zoom for Healthcare, Doxy.me, or Microsoft Teams healthcare, or specialized telehealth software with embedded medical tools (e.g., patient reaction guides and contrast reaction algorithms), provided they meet CMS security and privacy standards (e.g., HIPAA compliance). The setup must ensure a stable, high-quality connection to support patient safety and effective oversight.

This approach leverages tools that became widespread during the pandemic, allowing flexibility in staffing and access to care, especially in rural or underserved areas where on-site radiologists might not be available.

Does Virtual Direct Supervision Require Active Monitoring of Every Procedure?

The CMS virtual supervision policy definitively establishes that “immediate availability” is achieved through real-time audio and visual interactive telecommunications technology, eliminating the need for physical presence through December 31, 2025. In practice, this does not require the remote supervising physician to actively monitor each procedure—such as watching every contrast injection via video., but it does mandate that the physician remain readily accessible through these tools to intervene if necessary, suggesting that the physician should be on and available throughout the procedure. In other words, being on the video call throughout is the historical equivalent to being in an office on-site. Historical guidance from Reed Smith's Thomas Greeson confirms this aligns with in-person supervision standards, where availability, not constant observation, is key. This remains the operational standard, as validated by consistent industry practice and CMS intent. Confirm that your virtual supervision tool meets these standards.

Does CMS Extend Authority for IDTFs to Directly Supervise Certain Diagnostic Tests via Real-Time Audio and Visual Interactive Telecommunications Technology?

Yes, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has extended the authority for Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs) to use real-time audio and visual interactive telecommunications technology for direct supervision of certain diagnostic tests. This extension to IDTFs stems from the 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) Final Rule, released on November 1, 2023, and further clarified in updates like the 2025 MPFS Final Rule.

The updated PFS rule applies equally to both physician offices and ITDF settings, allowing the supervising physician—or, in physician offices, authorized practitioners like NPs or PAs under 42 CFR 410.32(b)(3)(ii)—to be virtually present rather than physically in the office suite. However, for IDTFs, only physicians proficient in the specific tests can supervise, as per the 'proficiency' requires of 42 CFR 310.33.

Which Diagnostic Tests Can be Supervised Remotely?

CMS ties the flexibility to services requiring "direct supervision" under Medicare rules (42 C.F.R. §§ 410.32(b)(3)(ii)). Here’s what we know:

  • General Scope: This applies to diagnostic tests that historically required a supervising physician’s immediate availability. These include imaging studies and other procedures where a physician oversees the administration or performance but doesn’t necessarily need to be physically present.

  • Temporary Subset: Virtual direct supervision is in place through the end of the year for Level 2 radiology tests, although on-going efforts for permanence are taking place. Tests like MRI and CT scans with contrast media (often classified as "Level 2" tests) are commonly cited, as they require direct supervision due to the use of contrast agents. Other examples might include certain ultrasound procedures or stress tests, depending on the IDTF’s enrollment and the codes listed on their CMS-855B application (Attachment 2). CMS has indicated that virtual supervision applies to services where real-time oversight ensures safety and quality, but not to "Level 3" tests (e.g., fluoroscopic-guided procedures like barium swallow studies) that require in-room presence.

  • Permanent Subset: CMS is permanently allowing virtual supervision for the following services:

    • Services furnished incident to a physician’s service when they are provided by auxiliary personnel employed by the physician and working under the physician’s direct supervision and for which the underlying HCPCS code has been assigned a PC/TC indicator of “5.” There typically refer to 'incident to' services.

    • Services described by CPT code 99211: office and other outpatient visits for the evaluation and management of an established patient that may not require the presence of a physician or other qualified healthcare professional. This is typically for established patients engageing in low-complexity visits.

Since IDTFs must specify the diagnostic tests they perform (via CPT codes) on their Medicare enrollment application, the eligible tests depend on what each facility is approved to provide. For a precise list, you’d need to check with the IDTF in question or CMS directly, as public sources don’t provide a universal catalog.

How Have Organizations Successfully Implemented Remote Contrast Supervision Policies?

Organizations have successfully implemented remote contrast supervision policies by adopting proven strategies that ensure compliance and efficiency. These include deploying robust telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., secure, high-quality audio/video platforms), establishing comprehensive training programs for staff and supervisors, and aligning with CMS, state, and accreditation requirements. Radiology practices and hospitals have leveraged these elements to seamlessly transition to virtual oversight, particularly at off-campus sites, demonstrating that a structured approach—supported by legal counsel—guarantees operational success and patient safety. Contact Tether Supervision to learn more.

Additional Notes

Temporary Extension: The current extension through December 31, 2025, applies broadly to diagnostic tests requiring direct supervision in IDTFs and physician offices. After that, unless CMS makes it permanent, in-person supervision might be required again unless further extended.

Why It Matters: This policy reduces the need for on-site physicians, potentially lowering costs and improving access, but it’s under scrutiny for long-term safety and efficacy. Advocacy from groups like the Radiology Business Management Association (RBMA) pushes for permanence, citing no significant overuse or safety issues to date.

Uncertainty: CMS’s incremental approach—testing permanence with "lower risk" services—leaves some ambiguity. The diagnostic imaging community is likely to push for clarity in upcoming comment periods.

If you need specifics for a particular IDTF or test, reaching out to CMS or checking the facility’s Medicare enrollment details would be the next step, as the exact tests depend on their approved scope of practice.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Read more from Tether Supervision

Tether is the leading platform for virtual contrast supervision, built for speed, safety, and seamless imaging operations.

Expert perspectives on safe, efficient contrast workflows and clinical readiness.

Tether is the leading platform for virtual contrast supervision, built for speed, safety, and seamless imaging operations.

Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.
Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.
Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.

Virtual Supervision Officially Recognized in California — AB 460 Signed Into Law

October 7, 2025, marks a milestone for California radiology.

Governor Gavin Newsom has officially signed Assembly Bill 460 (AB 460) into law, modernizing the state’s definition of “direct supervision” for contrast-enhanced imaging procedures.

Beginning January 1, 2026, radiologists in California will be able to meet supervision requirements either in person or remotely via real-time audio and video, with full access to imaging records and the ability to direct licensed onsite personnel.

This marks the first time California has formally recognized virtual supervision as an equivalent, compliant form of direct oversight for contrast-enhanced CT and similar procedures — aligning state policy with existing Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rules that have been in place since 2020.

What AB 460 Changes

For decades, California required supervising physicians to be physically present within the facility whenever contrast was administered by a technologist — a rule that limited flexibility and often constrained access to care, particularly in rural or multi-site imaging settings.

AB 460 updates this outdated framework by allowing:

  • Virtual direct supervision: Radiologists may now provide real-time oversight via secure audio/video communication (excluding audio-only).

  • Immediate availability: The supervising physician must remain available to intervene or direct onsite personnel if needed.

  • Access to imaging records: Physicians must have immediate access to the relevant imaging information to inform their supervision.

Key compliance detail: When supervision is provided remotely, facilities must have:

  • Written safety protocols for contrast administration and emergencies, and

  • Onsite licensed personnel — a physician, registered nurse (RN), nurse practitioner (NP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), or physician assistant (PA) — available to respond at the physician’s direction.

This onsite requirement must be reflected in both protocol documentation and staffing models for compliance.

Why AB 460 Matters for Imaging Centers

AB 460 represents a transformative update for outpatient imaging and radiology operations.

1. Expands Access to Care: For rural and community-based imaging centers, the ability to leverage virtual supervision ensures patients can access contrast-enhanced exams without delays or rescheduling due to radiologist availability.

2. Strengthens Patient Safety: By requiring trained onsite clinicians and standardized emergency protocols, the new law maintains — and in many cases, enhances — safety standards while enabling modern, technology-driven workflows.

3. Aligns with CMS Policy: CMS has recognized virtual direct supervision for diagnostic testing and incident-to services since 2020. AB 460 finally brings California’s Health & Safety Code into alignment with these federal standards, eliminating the compliance tension between state and federal definitions.

4. Reduces Operational Bottlenecks: Facilities can now scale coverage across multiple sites more efficiently, improving scheduling flexibility and optimizing radiologist workloads — without sacrificing oversight or compliance.

Tether Supervision’s Role in the Legislative Process

Tether Supervision closely tracked and contributed to AB 460 from its early drafts through final passage.

Our policy and operations team submitted written feedback and recommendations that helped refine the bill’s language — including clarifying the scope of virtual supervision and the requirements for onsite clinical responders.

We also worked alongside imaging leaders and advocacy groups to ensure the legislation supports:

  • Equitable access for small, rural, and independent imaging centers

  • Clarity for radiologists and administrators designing compliant workflows

  • Consistency with federal CMS and ACR standards

AB 460’s final language reflects a balance between safety, access, and operational practicality — the same balance that underpins Tether’s supervision model.

Preparing for Implementation: What Centers Should Do Now

With the law set to take effect on January 1, 2026, imaging centers should begin preparing their infrastructure, documentation, and staff training now.

Tether recommends:

  • Reviewing current supervision protocols to identify areas that require revision for compliance under AB 460.

  • Updating written procedures to incorporate virtual oversight workflows, including contrast reaction escalation and documentation standards.

  • Verifying onsite coverage — ensure licensed personnel are consistently available to respond during remote supervision.

  • Implementing HIPAA-compliant AV technology capable of supporting real-time communication and record access.

  • Training technologists and onsite staff on the new expectations for communication and escalation under virtual oversight.

Tether provides direct guidance and implementation support to imaging centers navigating this process, ensuring a smooth transition that’s fully compliant by 2026.

A Win for Radiology — and for Patients

AB 460 is more than a policy win. It’s a signal that California is ready to modernize supervision and embrace the proven safety and efficiency of virtual radiology oversight.

  • For imaging centers, it means fewer delays, more flexibility, and broader patient access.

  • For radiologists, it means a sustainable, scalable model for coverage.

  • For patients, it means timely, high-quality care delivered where and when it’s needed most.

At Tether Supervision, we’re proud to have supported this effort and remain committed to helping imaging centers translate legislation into safe, compliant, real-world practice.

We’re here to help your center prepare for implementation in 2026 — and lead confidently through the transition.

Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.
Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.
Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.

CMS Makes Virtual Direct Supervision Permanent Effective January 1, 2026

‍On October 31, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule, establishing a landmark policy change for healthcare delivery.

Beginning January 1, 2026, supervising physicians and non-physician practitioners (NPPs) may permanently meet the “presence” and “immediate availability” requirements of direct supervision through real-time, two-way audio and video communication.

This update transitions a temporary COVID-era flexibility into a permanent feature of Medicare policy—reflecting CMS’s recognition that modern telecommunication tools can uphold safety, accessibility, and quality in clinical supervision.

Policy Overview

The 2026 Final Rule amends the federal definition of direct supervision to allow supervising clinicians to be virtually “present” using interactive audiovisual technology. This rule primarily applies to diagnostic tests governed by 42 CFR § 410.32, many of which previously required physical on-site supervision. Additionall,y the rule applies to incident-to services (§410.26), pulmonary rehab (§410.47), cardiac and intensive cardiac rehab (§410.49), as well as RHC and FQHC services requiring direct supervision (§405.2413).

Key Provisions


  • Technology Standard: Direct supervision may now be satisfied through secure, real-time audio-video communication. Audio-only methods do not qualify.

  • Applicable Settings: This flexibility applies to office-based practices and Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs). Within IDTFs, only physicians with demonstrated proficiency in performing and interpreting the supervised test may provide remote oversight.

  • Safety-Based Exclusions: Procedures with 010 (minor, 10-day global) or 090 (major, 90-day global) surgical indicators remain excluded. CMS emphasized the need for on-site physician availability for services with inherent procedural or postoperative risk.

This decision balances operational efficiency with patient safety, ensuring that virtual supervision enhances—but does not replace—appropriate in-person clinical presence.

Alignment with Future Outpatient Rules

CMS also indicated that similar provisions are expected within the forthcoming Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule, which is pending Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review.

If finalized, these updates under 42 CFR §§ 410.27 and 410.28 would extend virtual supervision flexibility to hospital outpatient departments, harmonizing standards across outpatient and ambulatory care environments.

Implications for Healthcare Providers

The permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision carries significant implications for access, compliance, and workforce management.

1. Expanding Access to Care: Facilities in rural or underserved regions can now schedule diagnostic procedures without requiring a supervising physician to be physically on-site, reducing delays and improving patient throughput.
2. Enhancing Workforce Efficiency: Supervising physicians may oversee multiple locations remotely, optimizing specialist time, reducing non-clinical travel, and improving operational scalability.
3. Increasing Scheduling Flexibility: Centers can extend service hours—offering early, late, or weekend imaging—without compromising compliance, supervision, or patient safety.
4. Supporting Regulatory Consistency: This policy aligns Medicare supervision standards with state-level reforms such as California’s AB 460, which similarly authorizes real-time remote supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging beginning January 1, 2026.

Implementing CMS 2026 Virtual Supervision: A Compliance Framework

To ensure a seamless transition to virtual direct supervision under the new federal standard, Tether Supervision recommends the following best practices for imaging and diagnostic providers:

1. Technology Validation — Implement HIPAA-compliant audiovisual platforms that ensure:

  • Real-time, uninterrupted two-way communication

  • Latency monitoring and failover mechanisms

  • Automated session logging for audit and verification

2. Policy and Protocol Revisions — Update institutional supervision manuals to clearly define:

  • Virtual pre-test connectivity checks

  • Supervisor engagement documentation standards

  • Emergency escalation pathways (e.g., crash cart access and rapid response procedures)

3. State and Professional Alignment — Confirm that supervision practices remain consistent with:

  • State-specific licensing and scope-of-practice laws

  • ACR and ASRT guidance on contrast administration, injection safety, and technologist scope

  • On-site clinical response requirements for moderate- or high-risk procedures

4. Documentation Rigor — Maintain contemporaneous records detailing:

  • Supervising clinician credentials and participation times

  • Any technical interruptions or corrective measures

  • Patient consent and acknowledgment of virtual oversight

Tether’s documentation framework automates these records to ensure regulatory defensibility and operational transparency.

Quality Oversight and Future Expectations

CMS has indicated it will monitor outcomes related to virtual direct supervision through ongoing quality reporting, utilization reviews, and access metrics. Providers should proactively collect and analyze data on:

  • Virtual vs. in-person supervision ratios

  • Adverse event frequency and response times

  • Patient and technologist satisfaction measures

These metrics will help both CMS and healthcare organizations evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of tele-supervision frameworks.

Conclusion

The CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule represents a historic advancement in healthcare regulation, embedding virtual direct supervision into federal policy as a permanent, compliant, and scalable model of care.

For imaging centers, diagnostic testing facilities, and physician practices, this change unlocks new opportunities for access, flexibility, and modernization.

At Tether Supervision, we remain committed to helping organizations interpret these policy updates, design compliant operational protocols, and implement technology that meets both CMS and state-level supervision standards.

The future of clinical oversight is connected, compliant, and virtual—and it begins January 1, 2026.

Contact Tether Supervision to prepare your facility for the CMS 2026 implementation and optimize your supervision strategy for the year ahead.‍

A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.
A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.
A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.

CY 2026 CMS Medicare Rule Proposes Permanent Virtual Supervision, Telehealth Expansion

‍The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released its CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule, and with it comes a major shift in how supervision and telehealth services are regulated and reimbursed.

The proposal introduces long-awaited clarity around virtual direct supervision, builds on CMS’s evolving telehealth policies, and signals a permanent departure from some of the pandemic-era limitations. These changes could significantly impact radiology, diagnostic testing, outpatient imaging, and incident-to services across the country, especially in rural and underserved areas.

In this article, we’ll break down the proposed changes, what they mean for physician practices, and how healthcare organizations can prepare.

1. CMS Proposes Permanent Virtual Direct Supervision for Key Services

CMS is proposing to permanently adopt a definition of "direct supervision" that allows for real-time audio/visual telecommunications (excluding audio-only) for certain services. This rule would apply across:

  • Incident-to services under § 410.26

  • Diagnostic tests under § 410.32

  • Pulmonary rehabilitation under § 410.47

  • Cardiac and intensive cardiac rehabilitation under § 410.49

This change would codify the flexibility introduced during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency and could transform how supervising physicians manage multi-site service delivery, especially for services involving contrast-enhanced imaging, diagnostic testing, and clinical staff workflows.

Excluded for Now: Services with a global surgical indicator of 010 or 090 would not be eligible for virtual direct supervision. CMS is also seeking feedback on whether 000 global indicator procedures should be excluded due to patient safety concerns.

2. Streamlined Telehealth Services Review Process

CMS is also proposing to simplify the process for adding services to the Medicare Telehealth Services List by:

  • Removing the distinction between provisional and permanent services

  • Focusing reviews solely on whether the service can be safely delivered using interactive two-way audio-video telecommunications

This could accelerate access to telehealth-reimbursable services and make it easier for emerging clinical services, including those in imaging, oncology, or chronic care management, to be adopted under Medicare.

3. Removal of Frequency Limitations for Inpatient and Critical Care Telehealth

In another move that aligns with long-standing provider feedback, CMS is proposing to permanently remove telehealth frequency limitations for:

  • Subsequent inpatient visits

  • Subsequent nursing facility visits

  • Critical care consultations

This would give physicians and supervising practitioners more discretion to determine the appropriate cadence of virtual check-ins based on patient needs, not outdated frequency caps.

4. Implications for Radiology and Outpatient Imaging

For radiology groups, outpatient imaging centers, and hospital-based practices, these changes carry important implications:

  • Virtual contrast supervision workflows, which rely on direct supervision for technologists administering contrast, could be permanently validated at the federal level under § 410.32

  • Incident-to protocols that require on-site supervision (e.g., nurse-administered injections, diagnostic studies) could now permanently be supported via HIPAA-compliant video

  • Scheduling flexibility would improve, as supervising physicians could permanently oversee services remotely without delaying care due to location constraints

If finalized, these rules would also provide a permanent regulatory foundation for platforms like Tether Supervision, which enable secure, compliant virtual oversight across multiple care sites.

5. Key Takeaways and Next Steps

Healthcare organizations should begin preparing for virtual supervision now if they haven't yet:

  • Audit your supervision policies to identify services that could transition to virtual oversight

  • Train staff on what virtual direct supervision entails, and ensure AV systems meet CMS requirements

  • Identify your needs and consider whether choosing a virtual supervision provider is right for your organization

  • Comment on the rule: CMS is actively soliciting feedback, particularly around services with a 000 global indicator. This is an opportunity to shape federal policy to reflect operational realities

Conclusion

The CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule marks a major milestone in the evolution of virtual supervision and telehealth policy. By aligning supervision rules with technology-driven workflows and expanding telehealth access, CMS is moving toward a model that reflects the realities of modern care delivery.

Whether you’re a radiology group, an outpatient imaging center, or a hospital network managing contrast-enhanced exams and incident-to services, these proposals offer new flexibility -- and a chance to rethink how your team delivers safe, scalable, and compliant care.

You can read the full 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule summary here.