Alabama's Remote Supervision Ruling for Contrast Media Administration

Alabama's Remote Supervision Ruling for Contrast Media Administration

Alabama's Remote Supervision Ruling for Contrast Media Administration

The Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners’ ruling on August 17, 2023, permits ARRT-certified radiologic technologists to administer IV contrast media during CT and MRI scans under remote supervision by a board-certified radiologist using real-time audio-visual tech. An RN, CRNP, PA, or trained physician must be physically present to manage adverse reactions, aligning with CMS, ACR guidelines, and Alabama’s telehealth laws. This enhances efficiency and access to care, especially in rural areas, while maintaining strict safety protocols.

Tether Supervision

Feb 27, 2025

Legal & Regulatory

Legal & Regulatory

Legal & Regulatory

Visual representation of the Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners' ruling permitting ARRT-certified radiologic technologists to administer contrast media under remote supervision by a board-certified radiologist, provided an appropriately trained on-site licensed professional is present for emergency response.
Visual representation of the Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners' ruling permitting ARRT-certified radiologic technologists to administer contrast media under remote supervision by a board-certified radiologist, provided an appropriately trained on-site licensed professional is present for emergency response.
Visual representation of the Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners' ruling permitting ARRT-certified radiologic technologists to administer contrast media under remote supervision by a board-certified radiologist, provided an appropriately trained on-site licensed professional is present for emergency response.

‍On August 17, 2023, the Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners issued a declaratory ruling that permits radiologic technologists, holding certifications from the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT), to administer contrast media via intravenous injection under specific conditions of remote supervision. This ruling, requested by Outpatient Imaging Affiliates, LLC (OIA) and Diagnostic Health MRI of Gadsden, LLC d/b/a Outpatient Diagnostic Center (ODC), marks a significant evolution in Alabama's medical practice regulations, aligning with broader national trends and technological advancements in healthcare delivery.

Historical Context and Previous Regulations

Historically, the Board's guidance, as outlined in a 1999 opinion letter, allowed unlicensed personnel, including radiologic technologists, to administer injections under a physician's direct supervision, with the physician remaining responsible for their actions. However, a 2003 opinion letter tightened this requirement for contrast media administration, mandating that the supervising physician be immediately physically available on the premises. This stricter interpretation was based on the need for rapid response to potential adverse reactions, given the risks associated with contrast media.

The shift to the current ruling reflects changes driven by technological advancements and the public health emergency (PHE) for COVID-19, which necessitated flexible supervision models to maintain service delivery while minimizing exposure risks.

Details of the New Ruling

The ruling addresses the question of whether a radiologic technologist, holding ARRT certification and registration, may administer contrast media via IV injection during CT or MRI diagnostic tests under remote supervision. The answer, as provided, is affirmative under the following conditions:

Real-Time Supervision: The technologist must be under the real-time supervision of an Alabama-licensed, board-certified radiologist who is virtually present in the office suite via synchronous audio and visual real-time communications technology. This enables the radiologist to observe, direct, and furnish assistance throughout the procedure.

On-Site Personnel: An Alabama-licensed RN, CRNP, PA, or non-radiologist physician, appropriately trained to treat adverse reactions to contrast media, must be physically present at the originating site whenever contrast media is administered. This professional must be equipped to follow a symptom-and-sign-driven treatment algorithm and hold certifications such as Basic Life Support (BLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and, for pediatric patients, Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS).

Facility Requirements: The originating site facility must have policies and procedures that include a modality for the supervising radiologist to provide real-time instructions to the on-site healthcare provider. Additionally, the facility must be equipped with emergency supplies, equipment, and drugs necessary to treat contrast media reactions, and staff must undergo regular emergency management training.

Exclusions: The ruling notes that intravenous contrast media injections by radiologic technologists without a physically present radiologist are not permitted for patients with a prior allergic-like reaction to contrast media, pediatric patients (under 18), or pregnant patients, though the Board did not opine on the safety of administering contrast to these groups in this context.

Rationale and Influencing Factors

Several factors contributed to this ruling, reflecting both state-specific and national developments:

CMS Temporary Amendment: During the COVID-19 PHE, CMS amended its regulations to include virtual supervision within the definition of "direct supervision" for diagnostic tests, including those involving contrast media, to ensure continuity of care. This temporary measure, effective until December 31, 2024, as per recent ACR updates (ACR Supervision Guidelines for Contrast Studies), has influenced state-level adaptations.

ACR Practice Parameter: The American College of Radiology revised its Practice Parameter for the Use of Intravascular Contrast Media in 2022, allowing certified radiologic technologists to administer contrast media under supervision, including remote, provided an RN or similar professional is present and follows a treatment algorithm. This parameter, detailed in the ACR Manual on Contrast Media (2023), supports the competency of ARRT-certified technologists and the safety of remote supervision under certain conditions.

Telemedicine in Alabama: The Alabama Legislature's Act 2022-302, effective in 2022, established telehealth as a valid modality for delivering healthcare services, defining telemedicine as the provision of medical services via asynchronous or synchronous communications (Alabama Telehealth Laws). This legal framework supports the ruling, ensuring that physicians providing telehealth services owe the same duty of care as in-person providers.

Comparative Practices: OIA, operating in 17 states, highlighted similar remote supervision practices in Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and the District of Columbia, where radiologists supervise contrast media administration remotely while an on-site RN or equivalent is present. This growing acceptance underscores a national trend towards leveraging technology for healthcare delivery.

Safety Considerations and Patient Protections

The ruling emphasizes patient safety, requiring on-site personnel trained in managing acute hypersensitivity and physiologic reactions, as per ACR guidelines. These guidelines, outlined in the APR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Use of Intravascular Contrast Media (Revised 2022), include training in administering reassurance, oxygen, antihistamines, intravenous fluids, beta2-agonist inhalers, epinephrine, and understanding when to activate emergency response systems. The presence of emergency supplies and regular training further mitigates risks, addressing concerns raised by past incidents, such as the $5 million settlement by Omega Imaging Inc. for delivering contrast-enhanced exams without proper supervision (Radiology practice must pay $5M after delivering contrast imaging without doc supervision).

Implications for Outpatient Imaging Centers

For outpatient imaging centers like OIA and ODC, this ruling offers several benefits:

Increased Efficiency: Radiologists can supervise multiple centers remotely, potentially reducing operational costs and increasing access to services, particularly in rural areas. This aligns with the flexibility noted in ACR updates requirements for on-site staff overseeing contrast administration.

Cost-Effectiveness: By leveraging telehealth, centers can optimize radiologist coverage, potentially lowering staffing costs while maintaining compliance with Medicare and Medicaid billing requirements, as discussed in Radiology Billing and Coding: Physician Supervision Requirements for Radiology.

Patient Access: Enhanced supervision models can improve access to diagnostic imaging, especially in underserved regions, supporting the mission of independent diagnostic testing facilities (IDTFs) enrolled with Medicare.

However, centers must ensure strict adherence to the ruling's conditions, including maintaining emergency preparedness and training, to avoid compliance risks and ensure patient safety.

Comparative Analysis with National Standards

The ruling aligns with recent ACR changes, which, as of March 2024, continue to allow remote supervision temporarily, with calls for permanent adoption (ACR Changes CT and MRI Accreditation Contrast Media Supervision Requirements | Imaging Technology News). It also mirrors practices in other jurisdictions, such as Pennsylvania and Kentucky, where remote supervision is implemented with on-site RNs, as noted in OIA's submission to the Board. This convergence suggests a broader acceptance of telehealth in radiology, supported by evidence from The Role of ACR Protocols in Virtual Contrast Supervision, which highlights the safety of virtual supervision when ACR protocols are followed.

Conclusion

The Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners' ruling on August 17, 2023, represents a forward-looking adaptation to the evolving landscape of healthcare delivery, balancing efficiency with patient safety. By allowing remote supervision under stringent conditions, it aligns with national trends, influenced by the COVID-19 PHE, ACR guidelines, and Alabama's telehealth laws. For outpatient imaging centers, this offers opportunities for enhanced service delivery, but compliance with safety protocols remains paramount to ensure patient outcomes and regulatory adherence.

Link to the Declaratory Ruling

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Read more from Tether Supervision

Tether is the leading platform for virtual contrast supervision, built for speed, safety, and seamless imaging operations.

Expert perspectives on safe, efficient contrast workflows and clinical readiness.

Tether is the leading platform for virtual contrast supervision, built for speed, safety, and seamless imaging operations.

Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.
Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.
Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.

Virtual Supervision Officially Recognized in California — AB 460 Signed Into Law

October 7, 2025, marks a milestone for California radiology.

Governor Gavin Newsom has officially signed Assembly Bill 460 (AB 460) into law, modernizing the state’s definition of “direct supervision” for contrast-enhanced imaging procedures.

Beginning January 1, 2026, radiologists in California will be able to meet supervision requirements either in person or remotely via real-time audio and video, with full access to imaging records and the ability to direct licensed onsite personnel.

This marks the first time California has formally recognized virtual supervision as an equivalent, compliant form of direct oversight for contrast-enhanced CT and similar procedures — aligning state policy with existing Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rules that have been in place since 2020.

What AB 460 Changes

For decades, California required supervising physicians to be physically present within the facility whenever contrast was administered by a technologist — a rule that limited flexibility and often constrained access to care, particularly in rural or multi-site imaging settings.

AB 460 updates this outdated framework by allowing:

  • Virtual direct supervision: Radiologists may now provide real-time oversight via secure audio/video communication (excluding audio-only).

  • Immediate availability: The supervising physician must remain available to intervene or direct onsite personnel if needed.

  • Access to imaging records: Physicians must have immediate access to the relevant imaging information to inform their supervision.

Key compliance detail: When supervision is provided remotely, facilities must have:

  • Written safety protocols for contrast administration and emergencies, and

  • Onsite licensed personnel — a physician, registered nurse (RN), nurse practitioner (NP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), or physician assistant (PA) — available to respond at the physician’s direction.

This onsite requirement must be reflected in both protocol documentation and staffing models for compliance.

Why AB 460 Matters for Imaging Centers

AB 460 represents a transformative update for outpatient imaging and radiology operations.

1. Expands Access to Care: For rural and community-based imaging centers, the ability to leverage virtual supervision ensures patients can access contrast-enhanced exams without delays or rescheduling due to radiologist availability.

2. Strengthens Patient Safety: By requiring trained onsite clinicians and standardized emergency protocols, the new law maintains — and in many cases, enhances — safety standards while enabling modern, technology-driven workflows.

3. Aligns with CMS Policy: CMS has recognized virtual direct supervision for diagnostic testing and incident-to services since 2020. AB 460 finally brings California’s Health & Safety Code into alignment with these federal standards, eliminating the compliance tension between state and federal definitions.

4. Reduces Operational Bottlenecks: Facilities can now scale coverage across multiple sites more efficiently, improving scheduling flexibility and optimizing radiologist workloads — without sacrificing oversight or compliance.

Tether Supervision’s Role in the Legislative Process

Tether Supervision closely tracked and contributed to AB 460 from its early drafts through final passage.

Our policy and operations team submitted written feedback and recommendations that helped refine the bill’s language — including clarifying the scope of virtual supervision and the requirements for onsite clinical responders.

We also worked alongside imaging leaders and advocacy groups to ensure the legislation supports:

  • Equitable access for small, rural, and independent imaging centers

  • Clarity for radiologists and administrators designing compliant workflows

  • Consistency with federal CMS and ACR standards

AB 460’s final language reflects a balance between safety, access, and operational practicality — the same balance that underpins Tether’s supervision model.

Preparing for Implementation: What Centers Should Do Now

With the law set to take effect on January 1, 2026, imaging centers should begin preparing their infrastructure, documentation, and staff training now.

Tether recommends:

  • Reviewing current supervision protocols to identify areas that require revision for compliance under AB 460.

  • Updating written procedures to incorporate virtual oversight workflows, including contrast reaction escalation and documentation standards.

  • Verifying onsite coverage — ensure licensed personnel are consistently available to respond during remote supervision.

  • Implementing HIPAA-compliant AV technology capable of supporting real-time communication and record access.

  • Training technologists and onsite staff on the new expectations for communication and escalation under virtual oversight.

Tether provides direct guidance and implementation support to imaging centers navigating this process, ensuring a smooth transition that’s fully compliant by 2026.

A Win for Radiology — and for Patients

AB 460 is more than a policy win. It’s a signal that California is ready to modernize supervision and embrace the proven safety and efficiency of virtual radiology oversight.

  • For imaging centers, it means fewer delays, more flexibility, and broader patient access.

  • For radiologists, it means a sustainable, scalable model for coverage.

  • For patients, it means timely, high-quality care delivered where and when it’s needed most.

At Tether Supervision, we’re proud to have supported this effort and remain committed to helping imaging centers translate legislation into safe, compliant, real-world practice.

We’re here to help your center prepare for implementation in 2026 — and lead confidently through the transition.

Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.
Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.
Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.

CMS Makes Virtual Direct Supervision Permanent Effective January 1, 2026

‍On October 31, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule, establishing a landmark policy change for healthcare delivery.

Beginning January 1, 2026, supervising physicians and non-physician practitioners (NPPs) may permanently meet the “presence” and “immediate availability” requirements of direct supervision through real-time, two-way audio and video communication.

This update transitions a temporary COVID-era flexibility into a permanent feature of Medicare policy—reflecting CMS’s recognition that modern telecommunication tools can uphold safety, accessibility, and quality in clinical supervision.

Policy Overview

The 2026 Final Rule amends the federal definition of direct supervision to allow supervising clinicians to be virtually “present” using interactive audiovisual technology. This rule primarily applies to diagnostic tests governed by 42 CFR § 410.32, many of which previously required physical on-site supervision. Additionall,y the rule applies to incident-to services (§410.26), pulmonary rehab (§410.47), cardiac and intensive cardiac rehab (§410.49), as well as RHC and FQHC services requiring direct supervision (§405.2413).

Key Provisions


  • Technology Standard: Direct supervision may now be satisfied through secure, real-time audio-video communication. Audio-only methods do not qualify.

  • Applicable Settings: This flexibility applies to office-based practices and Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs). Within IDTFs, only physicians with demonstrated proficiency in performing and interpreting the supervised test may provide remote oversight.

  • Safety-Based Exclusions: Procedures with 010 (minor, 10-day global) or 090 (major, 90-day global) surgical indicators remain excluded. CMS emphasized the need for on-site physician availability for services with inherent procedural or postoperative risk.

This decision balances operational efficiency with patient safety, ensuring that virtual supervision enhances—but does not replace—appropriate in-person clinical presence.

Alignment with Future Outpatient Rules

CMS also indicated that similar provisions are expected within the forthcoming Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule, which is pending Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review.

If finalized, these updates under 42 CFR §§ 410.27 and 410.28 would extend virtual supervision flexibility to hospital outpatient departments, harmonizing standards across outpatient and ambulatory care environments.

Implications for Healthcare Providers

The permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision carries significant implications for access, compliance, and workforce management.

1. Expanding Access to Care: Facilities in rural or underserved regions can now schedule diagnostic procedures without requiring a supervising physician to be physically on-site, reducing delays and improving patient throughput.
2. Enhancing Workforce Efficiency: Supervising physicians may oversee multiple locations remotely, optimizing specialist time, reducing non-clinical travel, and improving operational scalability.
3. Increasing Scheduling Flexibility: Centers can extend service hours—offering early, late, or weekend imaging—without compromising compliance, supervision, or patient safety.
4. Supporting Regulatory Consistency: This policy aligns Medicare supervision standards with state-level reforms such as California’s AB 460, which similarly authorizes real-time remote supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging beginning January 1, 2026.

Implementing CMS 2026 Virtual Supervision: A Compliance Framework

To ensure a seamless transition to virtual direct supervision under the new federal standard, Tether Supervision recommends the following best practices for imaging and diagnostic providers:

1. Technology Validation — Implement HIPAA-compliant audiovisual platforms that ensure:

  • Real-time, uninterrupted two-way communication

  • Latency monitoring and failover mechanisms

  • Automated session logging for audit and verification

2. Policy and Protocol Revisions — Update institutional supervision manuals to clearly define:

  • Virtual pre-test connectivity checks

  • Supervisor engagement documentation standards

  • Emergency escalation pathways (e.g., crash cart access and rapid response procedures)

3. State and Professional Alignment — Confirm that supervision practices remain consistent with:

  • State-specific licensing and scope-of-practice laws

  • ACR and ASRT guidance on contrast administration, injection safety, and technologist scope

  • On-site clinical response requirements for moderate- or high-risk procedures

4. Documentation Rigor — Maintain contemporaneous records detailing:

  • Supervising clinician credentials and participation times

  • Any technical interruptions or corrective measures

  • Patient consent and acknowledgment of virtual oversight

Tether’s documentation framework automates these records to ensure regulatory defensibility and operational transparency.

Quality Oversight and Future Expectations

CMS has indicated it will monitor outcomes related to virtual direct supervision through ongoing quality reporting, utilization reviews, and access metrics. Providers should proactively collect and analyze data on:

  • Virtual vs. in-person supervision ratios

  • Adverse event frequency and response times

  • Patient and technologist satisfaction measures

These metrics will help both CMS and healthcare organizations evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of tele-supervision frameworks.

Conclusion

The CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule represents a historic advancement in healthcare regulation, embedding virtual direct supervision into federal policy as a permanent, compliant, and scalable model of care.

For imaging centers, diagnostic testing facilities, and physician practices, this change unlocks new opportunities for access, flexibility, and modernization.

At Tether Supervision, we remain committed to helping organizations interpret these policy updates, design compliant operational protocols, and implement technology that meets both CMS and state-level supervision standards.

The future of clinical oversight is connected, compliant, and virtual—and it begins January 1, 2026.

Contact Tether Supervision to prepare your facility for the CMS 2026 implementation and optimize your supervision strategy for the year ahead.‍

A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.
A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.
A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.

CY 2026 CMS Medicare Rule Proposes Permanent Virtual Supervision, Telehealth Expansion

‍The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released its CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule, and with it comes a major shift in how supervision and telehealth services are regulated and reimbursed.

The proposal introduces long-awaited clarity around virtual direct supervision, builds on CMS’s evolving telehealth policies, and signals a permanent departure from some of the pandemic-era limitations. These changes could significantly impact radiology, diagnostic testing, outpatient imaging, and incident-to services across the country, especially in rural and underserved areas.

In this article, we’ll break down the proposed changes, what they mean for physician practices, and how healthcare organizations can prepare.

1. CMS Proposes Permanent Virtual Direct Supervision for Key Services

CMS is proposing to permanently adopt a definition of "direct supervision" that allows for real-time audio/visual telecommunications (excluding audio-only) for certain services. This rule would apply across:

  • Incident-to services under § 410.26

  • Diagnostic tests under § 410.32

  • Pulmonary rehabilitation under § 410.47

  • Cardiac and intensive cardiac rehabilitation under § 410.49

This change would codify the flexibility introduced during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency and could transform how supervising physicians manage multi-site service delivery, especially for services involving contrast-enhanced imaging, diagnostic testing, and clinical staff workflows.

Excluded for Now: Services with a global surgical indicator of 010 or 090 would not be eligible for virtual direct supervision. CMS is also seeking feedback on whether 000 global indicator procedures should be excluded due to patient safety concerns.

2. Streamlined Telehealth Services Review Process

CMS is also proposing to simplify the process for adding services to the Medicare Telehealth Services List by:

  • Removing the distinction between provisional and permanent services

  • Focusing reviews solely on whether the service can be safely delivered using interactive two-way audio-video telecommunications

This could accelerate access to telehealth-reimbursable services and make it easier for emerging clinical services, including those in imaging, oncology, or chronic care management, to be adopted under Medicare.

3. Removal of Frequency Limitations for Inpatient and Critical Care Telehealth

In another move that aligns with long-standing provider feedback, CMS is proposing to permanently remove telehealth frequency limitations for:

  • Subsequent inpatient visits

  • Subsequent nursing facility visits

  • Critical care consultations

This would give physicians and supervising practitioners more discretion to determine the appropriate cadence of virtual check-ins based on patient needs, not outdated frequency caps.

4. Implications for Radiology and Outpatient Imaging

For radiology groups, outpatient imaging centers, and hospital-based practices, these changes carry important implications:

  • Virtual contrast supervision workflows, which rely on direct supervision for technologists administering contrast, could be permanently validated at the federal level under § 410.32

  • Incident-to protocols that require on-site supervision (e.g., nurse-administered injections, diagnostic studies) could now permanently be supported via HIPAA-compliant video

  • Scheduling flexibility would improve, as supervising physicians could permanently oversee services remotely without delaying care due to location constraints

If finalized, these rules would also provide a permanent regulatory foundation for platforms like Tether Supervision, which enable secure, compliant virtual oversight across multiple care sites.

5. Key Takeaways and Next Steps

Healthcare organizations should begin preparing for virtual supervision now if they haven't yet:

  • Audit your supervision policies to identify services that could transition to virtual oversight

  • Train staff on what virtual direct supervision entails, and ensure AV systems meet CMS requirements

  • Identify your needs and consider whether choosing a virtual supervision provider is right for your organization

  • Comment on the rule: CMS is actively soliciting feedback, particularly around services with a 000 global indicator. This is an opportunity to shape federal policy to reflect operational realities

Conclusion

The CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule marks a major milestone in the evolution of virtual supervision and telehealth policy. By aligning supervision rules with technology-driven workflows and expanding telehealth access, CMS is moving toward a model that reflects the realities of modern care delivery.

Whether you’re a radiology group, an outpatient imaging center, or a hospital network managing contrast-enhanced exams and incident-to services, these proposals offer new flexibility -- and a chance to rethink how your team delivers safe, scalable, and compliant care.

You can read the full 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule summary here.