Are Paramedics & EMTs Compliant with ACR Contrast Media Supervision Requirements in Medical Imaging?

Are Paramedics & EMTs Compliant with ACR Contrast Media Supervision Requirements in Medical Imaging?

Are Paramedics & EMTs Compliant with ACR Contrast Media Supervision Requirements in Medical Imaging?

This article delves into the complexities of using Paramedics and EMTs for contrast supervision in MRI and CT imaging, particularly in Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs). It scrutinizes the alignment of their roles with regulations set by the Texas Medical Board, CMS, ACR, and ASRT. Highlighting gaps in EMTs' training and certification, the article addresses the risks of non-compliance, including legal, financial, and reputational consequences.

Tether Supervision

Nov 27, 2024

Legal & Regulatory

Legal & Regulatory

Legal & Regulatory

Something went wrong. Try again.
Something went wrong. Try again.
Something went wrong. Try again.

Introduction

In MRI and CT imaging centers, particularly Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs), there are a number of questions around employing Parametrics & Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) for direct contrast supervision. Direct supervision is commonly understood to require a qualified professional who is physically present and immediately available to provide guidance, assistance, oversight, or intervention during the performance of contrast administration. But, the nuances of this requirement are often misunderstood. 

Utilizing Paramedics and EMTs to provide this supervision, while operationally convenient, raises significant questions regarding regulatory compliance. The deployment of Paramedics & EMTs in roles traditionally reserved for more highly qualified medical personnel is likely to conflict with these legal and regulatory frameworks. 

This article aims to delve into the intricate legal implications of such staffing decisions, scrutinizing whether the use of EMTs and/or Paramedics align with or contravenes the established standards. The central thesis we explore is the potential non-compliance risk that imaging centers might face when Paramedics or EMTs are assigned supervisory duties, a decision that could have far-reaching consequences in terms of legal and ethical medical practice.‍

The Role of EMTs and Paramedics in Imaging Centers

In the context of imaging centers, Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and Paramedics are often tasked with a range of responsibilities that primarily center around basic patient care and emergency response. Their duties typically include monitoring vital signs, providing basic life support, and assisting with patient mobility and comfort. EMTs and Paramedics are trained to handle acute medical situations, which makes them valuable in settings where patient health can rapidly change. However, their training does not extensively cover the specialized requirements and knowledge necessary for imaging procedures, but more importantly they are not compliant with the existing laws and regulations governing contrast supervision. .

Overview of Relevant Regulations and Laws

For the use of contrast media, adherence to strict regulatory standards and guidelines is paramount. These standards are designed to ensure patient safety and the efficacy of imaging procedures. The qualifications for personnel supervising contrast media administration are outlined by various regulatory and professional bodies, including the Texas Medical Board, Federal Medicare regulations under CMS guidelines, the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the American Society of Radiologic Technologists (ASRT).

  • Texas Medical Board Regulations: The Texas Medical Board outlines strict requirements for medical practices within the state. These regulations require that procedures involving contrast media be overseen by licensed medical professionals with specific training and qualifications. Paramedics and EMTs, while highly trained in emergency care, typically do not possess the specialized training in radiology or contrast media administration expected by these regulations.

  • Federal Medicare Regulations and CMS Guidelines: Medicare regulations and CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) guidelines stipulate specific standards for healthcare providers to receive Medicare reimbursement. These standards often include requirements for physician supervision, particularly for procedures involving contrast media. These regulations are designed to ensure patient safety and high-quality care. The qualifications of paramedics and EMTs generally do not meet the criteria set forth for these types of procedures under Medicare guidelines.

  • American College of Radiology (ACR) Guidelines: The ACR is a key authority in setting standards for radiological practices. In their recent update on CT and MRI Accreditation Contrast Media Supervision Requirements, the ACR emphasizes the need for qualified physicians to supervise contrast media administration. This is due to the potential risks and complications associated with contrast media, requiring a level of medical knowledge and immediate response capability that goes beyond the scope of EMT or paramedic training.

  • American Society of Radiologic Technologists (ASRT) Standards: ASRT standards support the use of qualified radiologic technologists and appropriately trained medical personnel in the administration of contrast media. These standards are designed to ensure that those handling contrast media have a comprehensive understanding of radiological procedures, patient safety, and the specific use of contrast agents. EMTs and paramedics typically do not have this specialized radiologic training.

Essentially, there are three reasons that EMTs and Paramedics are non-compliant.

  • EMT and Paramedics' Training and Certifications: Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and paramedics are trained primarily for emergency care in pre-hospital settings. Their expertise lies in providing acute medical care and life support, which, while critical, does not encompass the specialized knowledge required for supervising the use of contrast media in imaging procedures.

  • Alignment with Regulatory Requirements: The Texas Medical Board and Federal Medicare regulations, including CMS guidelines, often necessitate individuals in supervisory roles to have advanced medical training, particularly in radiology and contrast media use. These regulations are designed to ensure that those overseeing imaging procedures have a comprehensive understanding of the complexities involved, including potential contrast media reactions and their management. EMTs and paramedics, despite their valuable training, may not fulfill these specific regulatory requirements.

  • Gaps in Training or Scope: The scope of practice for EMTs and paramedics is distinct from the requirements for imaging center supervision. This includes a lack of specific training in radiologic technology, understanding contrast media reactions, and the technicalities of MRI and CT scans. Adherence to ACR guidelines and ASRT standards necessitates a level of expertise beyond the scope of EMTs and paramedics. These gaps in training and scope could lead to non-compliance with the stringent standards set by regulatory bodies, potentially compromising patient safety and imaging center compliance.

While EMTs and Paramedics are indispensable in their field, their training and scope of practice do not align with the specialized requirements for supervising contrast media administration in medical imaging settings. This misalignment could lead to potential risks in patient safety and regulatory compliance.

Risks of Non-Compliance

Non-compliance with the stringent standards set by regulatory bodies in the medical imaging field can lead to significant legal, financial, and reputational risks for healthcare facilities. Understanding these risks is crucial for maintaining the integrity and trustworthiness of medical services.

  • Legal Risks: Non-compliance can result in legal repercussions, including lawsuits and legal actions from patients or regulatory bodies. If a patient suffers adverse effects due to improper supervision or handling of contrast media, the facility and its staff could face legal liabilities. These legal challenges not only result in potential financial losses due to settlements or fines but also consume valuable time and resources.

  • Financial Risks: Financial penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. Regulatory bodies like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) may impose hefty fines on facilities that fail to adhere to their guidelines. Additionally, non-compliance can lead to the loss of accreditation, which is critical for reimbursement from insurance providers, including Medicare and Medicaid. This loss can severely impact a facility's revenue stream and financial stability.

  • Reputational Risks: The reputational damage from non-compliance can be long-lasting and more damaging than immediate legal or financial consequences. Healthcare facilities rely on their reputation for high-quality and compliant care to attract and retain patients. Non-compliance incidents can erode public trust, leading to a decrease in patient volume and a tarnished reputation in the medical community.

Case Studies or Real-World Examples

In recent years, there have been instances where healthcare facilities have faced compliance issues due to employing Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and Paramedics in roles that require specialized knowledge in medical imaging. 

For example, a medical center in Texas faced significant challenges when it was discovered that EMTs were used to supervise contrast media administration. This practice was in direct violation of the American College of Radiology's (ACR) guidelines, which require individuals with specific radiological training for such roles.

The outcome for this facility was severe. They faced substantial fines and were subjected to a rigorous compliance review by the Texas Medical Board. Additionally, the facility's accreditation with key medical bodies was put under scrutiny, leading to a temporary suspension. This not only resulted in financial losses but also affected the facility's reputation, leading to a decline in patient trust and confidence.

Another example involves a clinic that utilized EMTs for MRI and CT scan supervision. This led to a mismanagement incident where a patient had an adverse reaction to the contrast media, and the EMTs on duty were not equipped to handle the situation appropriately. The clinic faced legal action from the patient's family, hefty fines, and a mandatory overhaul of its operational protocols to ensure compliance with federal and state regulations.

Solutions and Best Practices

To avoid such compliance issues, healthcare facilities should:

  • Conduct Regular Audits: Regularly audit practices and procedures to ensure they align with current regulatory standards.

  • Staff Training and Certification: Ensure all staff, especially those involved in medical imaging, are appropriately trained and certified according to the ACR and other relevant bodies.

  • Consult Legal and Compliance Experts: Regularly consult with legal and compliance experts to stay updated on evolving regulations and standards.

  • Develop a Compliance-Oriented Culture: Foster a culture where compliance is a top priority, and staff are encouraged to stay informed and compliant with all regulations.

  • Implement a Transition Plan: For facilities currently utilizing non-compliant practices, develop a structured plan to transition to compliant practices, including hiring qualified personnel and retraining existing staff.

Conclusion

The use of EMTs in roles not aligning with regulatory standards in medical imaging can lead to significant legal, financial, and reputational risks. The case studies highlighted exemplify the serious repercussions facilities can face. Ensuring compliance with guidelines set by bodies like the ACR, CMS, and state medical boards is not just a regulatory requirement but a critical aspect of patient safety and care quality. Healthcare facilities must proactively adopt best practices, invest in proper training and certifications, and regularly review their compliance status to uphold the highest standards in medical imaging and patient care.

In addressing these compliance challenges, Tether Supervision stands as an exemplary solution. Our team of highly qualified, board-certified radiologists and physicians are specifically trained in the administration and supervision of contrast media in accordance with the latest ACR, CMS, and state regulatory guidelines. By partnering with us, healthcare facilities can mitigate the risks associated with non-compliance. We offer comprehensive services that include not only staffing with the appropriately trained professionals but also ongoing support and guidance to ensure that your facility remains compliant. With Tether Supervision, facilities can focus on providing top-notch patient care, confident in the knowledge that their contrast supervision needs are being met with the highest standards of compliance and expertise.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Take the uncertainty out of contrast supervision.

We’ll support your team every step of the way, from onboarding and training to live supervision and ongoing quality improvement.

Read more from Tether Supervision

Tether is the leading platform for virtual contrast supervision, built for speed, safety, and seamless imaging operations.

Expert perspectives on safe, efficient contrast workflows and clinical readiness.

Tether is the leading platform for virtual contrast supervision, built for speed, safety, and seamless imaging operations.

Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.
Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.
Summary of the article: California's AB 460 signed into law, allowing virtual direct supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging (CT/X-ray) starting January 1, 2026, aligning state law with CMS rules and improving access and operational efficiency while maintaining patient safety through required onsite licensed personnel and safety protocols.

Virtual Supervision Officially Recognized in California — AB 460 Signed Into Law

October 7, 2025, marks a milestone for California radiology.

Governor Gavin Newsom has officially signed Assembly Bill 460 (AB 460) into law, modernizing the state’s definition of “direct supervision” for contrast-enhanced imaging procedures.

Beginning January 1, 2026, radiologists in California will be able to meet supervision requirements either in person or remotely via real-time audio and video, with full access to imaging records and the ability to direct licensed onsite personnel.

This marks the first time California has formally recognized virtual supervision as an equivalent, compliant form of direct oversight for contrast-enhanced CT and similar procedures — aligning state policy with existing Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rules that have been in place since 2020.

What AB 460 Changes

For decades, California required supervising physicians to be physically present within the facility whenever contrast was administered by a technologist — a rule that limited flexibility and often constrained access to care, particularly in rural or multi-site imaging settings.

AB 460 updates this outdated framework by allowing:

  • Virtual direct supervision: Radiologists may now provide real-time oversight via secure audio/video communication (excluding audio-only).

  • Immediate availability: The supervising physician must remain available to intervene or direct onsite personnel if needed.

  • Access to imaging records: Physicians must have immediate access to the relevant imaging information to inform their supervision.

Key compliance detail: When supervision is provided remotely, facilities must have:

  • Written safety protocols for contrast administration and emergencies, and

  • Onsite licensed personnel — a physician, registered nurse (RN), nurse practitioner (NP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), or physician assistant (PA) — available to respond at the physician’s direction.

This onsite requirement must be reflected in both protocol documentation and staffing models for compliance.

Why AB 460 Matters for Imaging Centers

AB 460 represents a transformative update for outpatient imaging and radiology operations.

1. Expands Access to Care: For rural and community-based imaging centers, the ability to leverage virtual supervision ensures patients can access contrast-enhanced exams without delays or rescheduling due to radiologist availability.

2. Strengthens Patient Safety: By requiring trained onsite clinicians and standardized emergency protocols, the new law maintains — and in many cases, enhances — safety standards while enabling modern, technology-driven workflows.

3. Aligns with CMS Policy: CMS has recognized virtual direct supervision for diagnostic testing and incident-to services since 2020. AB 460 finally brings California’s Health & Safety Code into alignment with these federal standards, eliminating the compliance tension between state and federal definitions.

4. Reduces Operational Bottlenecks: Facilities can now scale coverage across multiple sites more efficiently, improving scheduling flexibility and optimizing radiologist workloads — without sacrificing oversight or compliance.

Tether Supervision’s Role in the Legislative Process

Tether Supervision closely tracked and contributed to AB 460 from its early drafts through final passage.

Our policy and operations team submitted written feedback and recommendations that helped refine the bill’s language — including clarifying the scope of virtual supervision and the requirements for onsite clinical responders.

We also worked alongside imaging leaders and advocacy groups to ensure the legislation supports:

  • Equitable access for small, rural, and independent imaging centers

  • Clarity for radiologists and administrators designing compliant workflows

  • Consistency with federal CMS and ACR standards

AB 460’s final language reflects a balance between safety, access, and operational practicality — the same balance that underpins Tether’s supervision model.

Preparing for Implementation: What Centers Should Do Now

With the law set to take effect on January 1, 2026, imaging centers should begin preparing their infrastructure, documentation, and staff training now.

Tether recommends:

  • Reviewing current supervision protocols to identify areas that require revision for compliance under AB 460.

  • Updating written procedures to incorporate virtual oversight workflows, including contrast reaction escalation and documentation standards.

  • Verifying onsite coverage — ensure licensed personnel are consistently available to respond during remote supervision.

  • Implementing HIPAA-compliant AV technology capable of supporting real-time communication and record access.

  • Training technologists and onsite staff on the new expectations for communication and escalation under virtual oversight.

Tether provides direct guidance and implementation support to imaging centers navigating this process, ensuring a smooth transition that’s fully compliant by 2026.

A Win for Radiology — and for Patients

AB 460 is more than a policy win. It’s a signal that California is ready to modernize supervision and embrace the proven safety and efficiency of virtual radiology oversight.

  • For imaging centers, it means fewer delays, more flexibility, and broader patient access.

  • For radiologists, it means a sustainable, scalable model for coverage.

  • For patients, it means timely, high-quality care delivered where and when it’s needed most.

At Tether Supervision, we’re proud to have supported this effort and remain committed to helping imaging centers translate legislation into safe, compliant, real-world practice.

We’re here to help your center prepare for implementation in 2026 — and lead confidently through the transition.

Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.
Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.
Alt text describing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision by CMS, effective January 1, 2026, as mandated by the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.

CMS Makes Virtual Direct Supervision Permanent Effective January 1, 2026

‍On October 31, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule, establishing a landmark policy change for healthcare delivery.

Beginning January 1, 2026, supervising physicians and non-physician practitioners (NPPs) may permanently meet the “presence” and “immediate availability” requirements of direct supervision through real-time, two-way audio and video communication.

This update transitions a temporary COVID-era flexibility into a permanent feature of Medicare policy—reflecting CMS’s recognition that modern telecommunication tools can uphold safety, accessibility, and quality in clinical supervision.

Policy Overview

The 2026 Final Rule amends the federal definition of direct supervision to allow supervising clinicians to be virtually “present” using interactive audiovisual technology. This rule primarily applies to diagnostic tests governed by 42 CFR § 410.32, many of which previously required physical on-site supervision. Additionall,y the rule applies to incident-to services (§410.26), pulmonary rehab (§410.47), cardiac and intensive cardiac rehab (§410.49), as well as RHC and FQHC services requiring direct supervision (§405.2413).

Key Provisions


  • Technology Standard: Direct supervision may now be satisfied through secure, real-time audio-video communication. Audio-only methods do not qualify.

  • Applicable Settings: This flexibility applies to office-based practices and Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs). Within IDTFs, only physicians with demonstrated proficiency in performing and interpreting the supervised test may provide remote oversight.

  • Safety-Based Exclusions: Procedures with 010 (minor, 10-day global) or 090 (major, 90-day global) surgical indicators remain excluded. CMS emphasized the need for on-site physician availability for services with inherent procedural or postoperative risk.

This decision balances operational efficiency with patient safety, ensuring that virtual supervision enhances—but does not replace—appropriate in-person clinical presence.

Alignment with Future Outpatient Rules

CMS also indicated that similar provisions are expected within the forthcoming Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule, which is pending Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review.

If finalized, these updates under 42 CFR §§ 410.27 and 410.28 would extend virtual supervision flexibility to hospital outpatient departments, harmonizing standards across outpatient and ambulatory care environments.

Implications for Healthcare Providers

The permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision carries significant implications for access, compliance, and workforce management.

1. Expanding Access to Care: Facilities in rural or underserved regions can now schedule diagnostic procedures without requiring a supervising physician to be physically on-site, reducing delays and improving patient throughput.
2. Enhancing Workforce Efficiency: Supervising physicians may oversee multiple locations remotely, optimizing specialist time, reducing non-clinical travel, and improving operational scalability.
3. Increasing Scheduling Flexibility: Centers can extend service hours—offering early, late, or weekend imaging—without compromising compliance, supervision, or patient safety.
4. Supporting Regulatory Consistency: This policy aligns Medicare supervision standards with state-level reforms such as California’s AB 460, which similarly authorizes real-time remote supervision for contrast-enhanced imaging beginning January 1, 2026.

Implementing CMS 2026 Virtual Supervision: A Compliance Framework

To ensure a seamless transition to virtual direct supervision under the new federal standard, Tether Supervision recommends the following best practices for imaging and diagnostic providers:

1. Technology Validation — Implement HIPAA-compliant audiovisual platforms that ensure:

  • Real-time, uninterrupted two-way communication

  • Latency monitoring and failover mechanisms

  • Automated session logging for audit and verification

2. Policy and Protocol Revisions — Update institutional supervision manuals to clearly define:

  • Virtual pre-test connectivity checks

  • Supervisor engagement documentation standards

  • Emergency escalation pathways (e.g., crash cart access and rapid response procedures)

3. State and Professional Alignment — Confirm that supervision practices remain consistent with:

  • State-specific licensing and scope-of-practice laws

  • ACR and ASRT guidance on contrast administration, injection safety, and technologist scope

  • On-site clinical response requirements for moderate- or high-risk procedures

4. Documentation Rigor — Maintain contemporaneous records detailing:

  • Supervising clinician credentials and participation times

  • Any technical interruptions or corrective measures

  • Patient consent and acknowledgment of virtual oversight

Tether’s documentation framework automates these records to ensure regulatory defensibility and operational transparency.

Quality Oversight and Future Expectations

CMS has indicated it will monitor outcomes related to virtual direct supervision through ongoing quality reporting, utilization reviews, and access metrics. Providers should proactively collect and analyze data on:

  • Virtual vs. in-person supervision ratios

  • Adverse event frequency and response times

  • Patient and technologist satisfaction measures

These metrics will help both CMS and healthcare organizations evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of tele-supervision frameworks.

Conclusion

The CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule represents a historic advancement in healthcare regulation, embedding virtual direct supervision into federal policy as a permanent, compliant, and scalable model of care.

For imaging centers, diagnostic testing facilities, and physician practices, this change unlocks new opportunities for access, flexibility, and modernization.

At Tether Supervision, we remain committed to helping organizations interpret these policy updates, design compliant operational protocols, and implement technology that meets both CMS and state-level supervision standards.

The future of clinical oversight is connected, compliant, and virtual—and it begins January 1, 2026.

Contact Tether Supervision to prepare your facility for the CMS 2026 implementation and optimize your supervision strategy for the year ahead.‍

A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.
A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.
A summary of the CMS CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, detailing the permanent adoption of virtual direct supervision and the expansion of telehealth services.

CY 2026 CMS Medicare Rule Proposes Permanent Virtual Supervision, Telehealth Expansion

‍The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released its CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule, and with it comes a major shift in how supervision and telehealth services are regulated and reimbursed.

The proposal introduces long-awaited clarity around virtual direct supervision, builds on CMS’s evolving telehealth policies, and signals a permanent departure from some of the pandemic-era limitations. These changes could significantly impact radiology, diagnostic testing, outpatient imaging, and incident-to services across the country, especially in rural and underserved areas.

In this article, we’ll break down the proposed changes, what they mean for physician practices, and how healthcare organizations can prepare.

1. CMS Proposes Permanent Virtual Direct Supervision for Key Services

CMS is proposing to permanently adopt a definition of "direct supervision" that allows for real-time audio/visual telecommunications (excluding audio-only) for certain services. This rule would apply across:

  • Incident-to services under § 410.26

  • Diagnostic tests under § 410.32

  • Pulmonary rehabilitation under § 410.47

  • Cardiac and intensive cardiac rehabilitation under § 410.49

This change would codify the flexibility introduced during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency and could transform how supervising physicians manage multi-site service delivery, especially for services involving contrast-enhanced imaging, diagnostic testing, and clinical staff workflows.

Excluded for Now: Services with a global surgical indicator of 010 or 090 would not be eligible for virtual direct supervision. CMS is also seeking feedback on whether 000 global indicator procedures should be excluded due to patient safety concerns.

2. Streamlined Telehealth Services Review Process

CMS is also proposing to simplify the process for adding services to the Medicare Telehealth Services List by:

  • Removing the distinction between provisional and permanent services

  • Focusing reviews solely on whether the service can be safely delivered using interactive two-way audio-video telecommunications

This could accelerate access to telehealth-reimbursable services and make it easier for emerging clinical services, including those in imaging, oncology, or chronic care management, to be adopted under Medicare.

3. Removal of Frequency Limitations for Inpatient and Critical Care Telehealth

In another move that aligns with long-standing provider feedback, CMS is proposing to permanently remove telehealth frequency limitations for:

  • Subsequent inpatient visits

  • Subsequent nursing facility visits

  • Critical care consultations

This would give physicians and supervising practitioners more discretion to determine the appropriate cadence of virtual check-ins based on patient needs, not outdated frequency caps.

4. Implications for Radiology and Outpatient Imaging

For radiology groups, outpatient imaging centers, and hospital-based practices, these changes carry important implications:

  • Virtual contrast supervision workflows, which rely on direct supervision for technologists administering contrast, could be permanently validated at the federal level under § 410.32

  • Incident-to protocols that require on-site supervision (e.g., nurse-administered injections, diagnostic studies) could now permanently be supported via HIPAA-compliant video

  • Scheduling flexibility would improve, as supervising physicians could permanently oversee services remotely without delaying care due to location constraints

If finalized, these rules would also provide a permanent regulatory foundation for platforms like Tether Supervision, which enable secure, compliant virtual oversight across multiple care sites.

5. Key Takeaways and Next Steps

Healthcare organizations should begin preparing for virtual supervision now if they haven't yet:

  • Audit your supervision policies to identify services that could transition to virtual oversight

  • Train staff on what virtual direct supervision entails, and ensure AV systems meet CMS requirements

  • Identify your needs and consider whether choosing a virtual supervision provider is right for your organization

  • Comment on the rule: CMS is actively soliciting feedback, particularly around services with a 000 global indicator. This is an opportunity to shape federal policy to reflect operational realities

Conclusion

The CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule marks a major milestone in the evolution of virtual supervision and telehealth policy. By aligning supervision rules with technology-driven workflows and expanding telehealth access, CMS is moving toward a model that reflects the realities of modern care delivery.

Whether you’re a radiology group, an outpatient imaging center, or a hospital network managing contrast-enhanced exams and incident-to services, these proposals offer new flexibility -- and a chance to rethink how your team delivers safe, scalable, and compliant care.

You can read the full 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule summary here.